PDF annotation for medical writers
Claim substantiation workspace for medical communications teams.
Illustrative workspace with synthetic demo data, not a completed customer review.
From deliverable to defensible review
Keep the claim, its exact document context, and potential supporting evidence visible in one review workflow.
- 01Bring the project together
Organize the primary deliverable and its supporting references inside one private project.
- 02Structure the content
Read document content and identify source-linked claims without altering the originals.
- 03Find relevant sources
Search only the uploaded project references and preserve exact source locations.
- 04Review with context
Compare support, contradiction, qualification, and numerical results before any decision.
Evidence stays traceable. Judgment stays human.
A relevant source does not necessarily support a claim. The review workspace keeps conflicting evidence visible so you can assess uncertainty.
- Exact context
- See each claim alongside the text from its location in the deliverable.
- Current sources
- Only the current references uploaded to your project are shown.
- Structured signals
- Support, contradiction, qualification, and exact numerical checks use explicit labels.
- Read-only preview
- The current preview is read-only. Saving review decisions and inserting citations are not yet available.
Move faster without surrendering oversight.
Designed for medical writers, medical directors, editors, and agency teams who need a clear chain from claim to source and a deliberate human checkpoint.